{"AuthorName":"Sujithkumar Parayil","Description":"
Introduction<\/strong><\/a> In his small shop in Kottayam (Kerala), Cheriyan is busy, mounting pictures of various iconic figures, including religious as well as reform leaders, which are printed at Sivakasi and Ernakulam and have a ready market [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> This study documents and analyses contemporary practices of iconisation of social-religious reform leaders of Kerala of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, to understand the visual vocabularies, forms, conventions and circulative meanings of a popular visual culture practices.<\/p>\r\n\r\n I begin with a story:<\/p>\r\n\r\n This is the story of how the famous photographer of the Travancore Palace, Zachariah D’cruz took the photograph of the Bishop H.H Parumala Mar Gregorios, popularly known as Parumala Thirumeni [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> …..It was already past 11’oclock. Zachariah D’cruz positioned the camera correctly in the churchyard and informed the bishop. Bishop Parumala wore his outer vestments and headscarf and stood before the curtain. D’cruz peered into the camera in preparation for the photograph. Despite making several adjustments with his lens, he was unable to get the right image of the bishop. The sunlight was fierce and harsh. Seeing D’cruz struggling without taking the picture, finally Bishop Parumala asked him what the matter was.<\/em><\/p>\r\n\r\n “I feel very sad that I am not able to get a good photograph for a government record that has space for good pictures” said D’cruz. Bishop Parumala looked intently at D’cruz’s face and then immediately went into meditation standing with his face turned silently up towards the sun. He then raised his gold crucifix to the sky and reverently traced the holy cross. Wonders! Instantly a dark cloud appeared and shielded the blazing sun. The light was just right as perfect as, or even more so, than a studio light. D’cruz was totally shaken. The Bishop calmly directed D’cruz to swiftly take the picture. Swinging into action, D’cruz quickly adjusted the backdrop and his august model’s stance and proceeded to rapidly open and then shut his lens. In an instant, D’cruz saw that the sky had returned to what it was. No sign of change. The sun’s orb stood alone in the sky blazing as furiously as ever. There was no sign of the dark cloud. Nothing! Where did it vanish? How did it go? It was all over in an instant… <\/em>(Karingattil 2002, 375-78*).<\/p>\r\n\r\n Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> This study will also address the question of how publicly circulated images of male reform leaders have attained and produced different meanings—secular, religious and political—within the everyday practices of the Kerala society. I intend to show the changes in photographic representation when a man attains the status of guru\/saint. The images and their bodily positioning are analysed along with the problem of how the social reform project influenced the construction of such images. Does the introduction of new technologies and images generate new ideas for reform? Along with this question, we need to consider how new visual practices create new sorts of sacred spaces, as well as how images and the situated\/exhibited spaces they contain produce the religious and political ideologies of the present. To begin with, I briefly examine the sequences of ‘pictoriography’ of the iconographic construction of four socio-religious reform leaders: (1) Parumala Thirumeni (1848-1902), (2) Chattambi Swamikal (1853-1924), (3) Ayankali (1863-1941) and (4) Poykayil Sree Kumara Gurudevan (Poyakayil Yohannan,1879-1939). Later in this essay, I further contextualize the various images of (5) Sree Narayana Guru (1855-1928) created over the last half century, the spaces where they were circulated and the manner in which they generated meanings.<\/p>\r\n\r\n *Karingattil, John Thomas, Fr. 2002. “Parumala Thirumeni Chithrakalayil (Parumala Thirumeni in the art of painting)”. In Jacob Kurian ed., Parumala Smruthi, 375-382. Kottayam: Malankara Sabha.<\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n <\/p>\r\n\r\n Parumala Thirumeni, Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> Saint Gregorios of Parumala is popularly known as ‘Parumala Thirumeni’<\/em><\/strong>. Metropolitan Gee Varghese Mar Gregorios of the Malankara Orthodox Church became the first declared saint from Malankara to be called ‘Parumala Thirumeni.’The sources of the discursively arranged photographs and pictures of Parumala Thirumeni on this page are varied, and have been collected primarily from books, news papers and the internet. These will illustrate the ways in which a process of iconisation of this “saint” has taken place. Only four photographs of Parumala Thirumeni survive today. They include the one which was shot when he was twentynine years old in which he appears in the priestly robes of his denomination [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> In the collation of photographs and paintings shown on this page, the black &white as well as sepia tone photographs are based on the photo taken by D’cruz [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> At present, this particular Ravi Varma picture of Thirumeni is in circulation, and has also been was further retouched to evoke maximum pleasing nature, lustrous and benevolence [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> <\/p>\r\n\r\n The Process of Iconic Construction<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> In Christianity, the practice of iconolatry is more prevalent where the icon making often begins with the symbolic representation of Jesus Christ, Mother Mary and the different apostles of Christ [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> This can be further illustrated with Parumala Thirumeni’s samadhi photographs and pictures. [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> To elaborate this, I shall extract the visual experiences of an observer who has seen a painted version of Tirumeni’s samadhi<\/em> [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> “There is nothing wrong in that we are familiar with the picture of Thirumeni in his prime youth. When we go beyond the photograph we could meditate on the holiness that Thirumeni’s body radiates even when it is laid in state. I have seen the portrait in the Aramana at Devalokam (Bishop House). But now, I am able to recall and meditate on it. What is enchanting to me more than the liveliness of the picture created by the dexterity of the painter is the peacefulness visible on the face of the skeleton-like remains of corpse the presence of God on him that Thirumeni left behind when he passed away. I am unable to capture in words, the spiritual merriment that I have experienced on numerous occasions when I stood in front of the portrait in meditation. It is a unique moment of fulfillment of union of worshiper and worshipped that became tangible to us when we fix our eyes on that portrait. I felt nearer to the heavenly experience in front of that portrait. There are no other moments in which I was jealous of Parumala Thirumeni” <\/em>(Babupaul, quoted Karingattil 2002, 382*).<\/em><\/p>\r\n\r\n Photographs taken by D’cruz formed the template on which many other artists innovated and ‘reformed’ the icons of the Thirumeni. These reformed iconic images are used in different domains like church, houses and public places for the practice of worship where “he shines in the cloud of witnesses as a bright luminary giving rays of hope to millions in their sufferings and struggles.”<\/em><\/p>\r\n\r\n <\/p>\r\n\r\n Ayyankali (1863-1941)<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span> It is against this background that I would like to further illustrate the process of iconic meaning-making around images of other male social reform leaders whose personalities were deified in the subsequent decades. Let us look at the currently circulated images of Ayyankali, the most important Dalit leader of twentieth century Kerala. These mark the sudden transformation of his image in accordance with the images of social reformers who came to occupy the status of gurus [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>
\r\nParumala Thirumeni, or Saint Gregorios of Parumala (1848-1902)<\/strong><\/a>
\r\nThe Process of Iconic Construction<\/strong><\/a>
\r\nAyyankali (1863-1941)<\/strong><\/a>
\r\nChattambi Swamikal (1853-1924)<\/strong><\/a>
\r\nPoyikayil Yohannan (1879-1939)<\/strong><\/a>
\r\nSree Narayana Guru (1855-1928)<\/strong><\/a>
\r\nFrom Photograph to Icon<\/strong><\/a>
\r\nSacred Icons, Divine Functions<\/strong><\/a>
\r\nIcons and Ideological Terrains<\/strong><\/a>
\r\nThe Aura of the ‘Sacred’ and the ‘Secular’<\/strong><\/a>
\r\nConclusion: Visuality and Invisible Histories<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\r\n\r\nFig.1: Cherian at his SM Photo Frame Works shop, Kottayam, November 2007. Photograph by author.<\/h2>\">Fig. 01<\/a> - Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig. 4: Other Side of SM Photo Frame Works, November 2007. Photograph by author.<\/h2>\">Fig. 04<\/a>]…and Cheriyan is busy.<\/em><\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.1: Cherian at his SM Photo Frame Works shop, Kottayam, November 2007. Photograph by author.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 01<\/a><\/span> Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.2: Displayed images for sale at \u2018SM Photo Frame Works\u2019, Kottayam, November 2007. Photograph by author.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 02<\/a><\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.3: Another view of the ‘SM Photo Frame Works’ shop, November 2007. Photograph by author.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 03<\/a><\/span> <\/span>Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig. 4: Other Side of SM Photo Frame Works, November 2007. Photograph by author.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 04<\/a><\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.5: Parumala Thirumeni. Photograph by Zachariah D’cruz (1902). Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">Fig. 05<\/a>]. He was ordered to do by the Dewan Peshkar Nagamayya in order to provide a specimen illustration of the “Puthenkoot Metropolitan” style of attire in his famous Travancore State Manual<\/em>. After several unsuccessful attempts, the Bishop one day agreed to have his photograph taken any time other than the morning and afternoon prayer times. The rest of the ‘story’ or ‘event’ has been narrated by the renowned artist K. M Varghese:<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.5: Parumala Thirumeni. Photograph by Zachariah D’cruz (1902). Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 05<\/a><\/span>This story reveals how the new technology of photography—which apparently reproduces factual reality—was also caught up with the mysterious\/supernatural powers and veneration of a spiritual and religious leader of the Malankara Church. However, the primary intention here is not to analyse such adoration. Instead it is to examine the process of efficacies of iconographic construction and its circulation in the public domain of Kerala. The story narrated above together with the image taken by D’cruz itself constructs the aura of liminal\/divine power of that image. The image itself acquired an iconographic status for iconolatry, or image worship. In this process, the iconisation of the image, as well as the practice of iconolatry, modify the original photographic image. In this modification, various visual technologies such as photography, painting and printing are appropriated, and their aesthetic sensibilities are integrated to create a radiant divine aura for the image of the religious and reform leaders. It is in this context that I have attempted to document and analyse the contemporary practices of iconisation of images of reform leaders such as Parumala Thirimeni, Ayyankali, Poyikayil Yohanan (Sree Kumara Guru Devan), Chattampi Swamikal, and Sree Narayana Guru. While documenting historical and contemporary photographs and other images of these reformists, I shall also explain the historically evolved process of male icon making.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\r\nor Saint Gregorios of Parumala (1848-1902)<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\nFig.6: Parumala Thirumeni at age 29 (photographer unknown). Reproduced fromFr.Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 06<\/a><\/span> Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.7: Parumala Thirumeni. Photograph taken by Zachariah D’cruz (1902). Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 07<\/a><\/span> <\/span>Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.8: Parumala Thirumeni. Photograph in Sepia colour tone. Reproduced from www.parumalachurch.com, August 2007.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 08<\/a><\/span> <\/span>Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.9: Parumala Thirumeni. Painting by K. M Varghese. Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 09<\/a><\/span> <\/span>Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.10: Parumala Thirumeni. Painting by Raja Ravi Varma, 1903. Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002 (This painting is on display at Attamangalam Church, Kumarakom).<\/h2>\">
Fig. 10<\/a><\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n
A modified version of Ravi Varma\u2019s Parumala Thirumeni (artist unknown). Reproduced from www.saintgregorios.org (Accessed on August 2007).<\/h2>\">
Fig. 11<\/a><\/span> <\/span>Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.12: Parumala Thirumeni, another painting in circulation. Reproduced from www.parumalathirumeni.com (Accessed on August 2007).<\/h2>\">
Fig. 12<\/a><\/span> <\/span>Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.13: Painted image of Parumala Thirumeni by Babu Chenganur (first printed by MGM Book House). Reproduced from Malayala Manorama 3rd November 2006.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 13<\/a><\/span> <\/span>Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.14: Painted version of Parumal Thirumeni from http:\/\/www.parumalachurch.com and www.parumalathirumeni.com (Accessed on August 2007).<\/h2>\">
Fig. 14<\/a><\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.6: Parumala Thirumeni at age 29 (photographer unknown). Reproduced fromFr.Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">Fig. 06<\/a>]. The second and third are group photographs but they are not in circulation. The fourth one [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.7: Parumala Thirumeni. Photograph taken by Zachariah D’cruz (1902). Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">Fig. 07<\/a>], taken by D’cruz, is more prominent, and different adaptations of this photograph widely circulate even today. Photographs and paintings of Parumala Thirumeni’s samadhi<\/em> or kabaradakka<\/em> (burial) are in circulation and are used as object of veneration [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.17: Reproduction of the original samadhi photograph of Parumala Thirumeni, from Catholicatinte Nidhi (Biography and Study of H.H Baselius Gheevargheese), Baselius Research Centre, Vakathanam, 2005.<\/h2>\">Fig. 17<\/a> - Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.20: Parumala Thirumeni in another samadhi painting. Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">Fig. 20<\/a>]<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.6: Parumala Thirumeni at age 29 (photographer unknown). Reproduced fromFr.Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">Fig. 06<\/a> - Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.8: Parumala Thirumeni. Photograph in Sepia colour tone. Reproduced from www.parumalachurch.com, August 2007.<\/h2>\">Fig. 08<\/a>]. The rest of the series are painted amendments of the same photograph taken by D’cruz. It was the famous artists K. M Varghese (1888-1962) and Raja Ravi Varma (1848-1906) who first used D’Cruz’s photograph to produce the painted and coloured image of the saint [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.9: Parumala Thirumeni. Painting by K. M Varghese. Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">Fig. 09<\/a> - Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.10: Parumala Thirumeni. Painting by Raja Ravi Varma, 1903. Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002 (This painting is on display at Attamangalam Church, Kumarakom).<\/h2>\">Fig. 10<\/a>]. It could be observed that there was not much change when artist K. M Varghese painted Parumala Thirumeni, except for the vibrant coloured visual effects of each object in the photographs [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.9: Parumala Thirumeni. Painting by K. M Varghese. Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">Fig. 09<\/a>]. From Ravi Varma’s painting onwards [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.9: Parumala Thirumeni. Painting by K. M Varghese. Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">Fig. 09<\/a>], a slight but distinguishable change occurred in the visual vocabularies of the image where a radiant and shimmer light appear in the background of the image that further illuminated and projected the holiness of Thirumeni [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
A modified version of Ravi Varma\u2019s Parumala Thirumeni (artist unknown). Reproduced from www.saintgregorios.org (Accessed on August 2007).<\/h2>\">Fig. 11<\/a>]. When he started painting the portrait of Thirumeni by using the photograph as model and completed one picture, Ravi Varma was not satisfied with the result and began to paint another one. The artist recalled later that after completing the picture he also felt that Thirumeni had the extraordinary magnificence of a holy man (Karingattil 2002, 378). Ravi Varma could successfully insert supernatural and religious elements radiating power into the painting, providing a different aesthetic dimension to the image. Considering the dimension of reality of the image, one can argue that the particular discourses and the social imaginary that it produced attributed meanings to such constructions.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
A modified version of Ravi Varma\u2019s Parumala Thirumeni (artist unknown). Reproduced from www.saintgregorios.org (Accessed on August 2007).<\/h2>\">Fig. 11<\/a> - Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.12: Parumala Thirumeni, another painting in circulation. Reproduced from www.parumalathirumeni.com (Accessed on August 2007).<\/h2>\">Fig. 12<\/a>]. After K. M Varghese and Ravi Varma, there were many others who have produced images of Thirumeni, but all of them tend to be emulations of Ravi Varma’s effort. However, these publicly circulated painted images have been replete with more illuminated signs of divinity. The range of images given here will show this transition among which, the last two images which attain the zenith of the pictorial iconiastion of Thirumeni, were drawn by Babu Chenganur, the artist who studied at Ravi Varma Fine Arts College, Mavelikkara [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.13: Painted image of Parumala Thirumeni by Babu Chenganur (first printed by MGM Book House). Reproduced from Malayala Manorama 3rd November 2006.<\/h2>\">Fig. 13<\/a> & Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.14: Painted version of Parumal Thirumeni from http:\/\/www.parumalachurch.com and www.parumalathirumeni.com (Accessed on August 2007).<\/h2>\">Fig. 14<\/a>]. Babu Chenganur pictured Thirumeni’s image against a background of clouds to add a further sheen to the facial expression and graceful aura. Babu Chenganur knew that “even though Thirumeni had a dark complexion, in the minds of the mass his face is replete with the glowing whitish” (Karingattil 2002, 379-80). According to K. K Philip, another artist who has painted a number of Thirumeni’s pictures, “dark-skin (mixed complexion), lean body, commanding eyes, devout lips have been given to the picture which I have drawn” (Karingattil 2002, 380). Still, all these artists’ images had their origin in the photographic model that was captured by D’Cruz in 1902. In this context, it can be said that it is through a careful juxtaposition of real and imaginary ideas that the ideal icon of this religious leader has been created. This ideal icon is constituted by combining certain notions such as the representation of the real body and symbolic objects (such as the rod of the Bishop which has symbolic power (amshavadi<\/em>), the religious attire of the sect, and the crucifix), with the illusory and imaginative ideas of tranquility, devoutness, holiness, and blissful facial expressions with a sparkling and shining halo as well as the posture of blessing. A close reading of such icons show their interesting movement across a spectrum following certain hierarchical notions.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.15: A Thanksgiving advertisement in which St. Judas and Mother Mary are reproduced as photo images. Reproduced from Malayala Manorama, 15th September 2007, Kottayam Edition.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 15<\/a><\/span> Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.16: Extracted from a 2006-calendar in which leaders of Malankara Church are displayed.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 16<\/a><\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.15: A Thanksgiving advertisement in which St. Judas and Mother Mary are reproduced as photo images. Reproduced from Malayala Manorama, 15th September 2007, Kottayam Edition.<\/h2>\">Fig. 15<\/a>]. There is a tradition and hierarchy in the iconographic representation of Christian religious leaders in modern Kerala. One can extend this point into the iconographic representation of Hindu religious and reform leaders as well, which is discussed in the latter part of this essay. [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.16: Extracted from a 2006-calendar in which leaders of Malankara Church are displayed.<\/h2>\">Fig. 16<\/a>] indicates a hierarchical order in which Parumala Thirumeni is in third place. In this calendar art composite of the different saints of the Malanakara Syrian Church, Holy Mother Mary is accorded first place followed by St. Thomas and the holy Parumala Thirumeni. All known visual vocabularies and cherished imaginations are used here to construct the universal meanings of iconography. However, the spectator or viewer needs to be aware of the particular discursive cultural context of the image to experience the iconic value of these images. In other words, an active or a subjective visual experience is needed to perceive the diffused sign value of any iconic image. This habituated experience (both cultural and visual) might have varied according to the inner inclinations of the person who is seeing this image\/icon. Therefore, the iconic value of the image and its cultural effects depends on the person who is seeing it as well.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.17: Reproduction of the original samadhi photograph of Parumala Thirumeni, from Catholicatinte Nidhi (Biography and Study of H.H Baselius Gheevargheese), Baselius Research Centre, Vakathanam, 2005.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 17<\/a><\/span> Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.18: Samadhi of Parumala Thirumeni. Photograph in colour tone. Reproduced from www.icbs.com\/prayer\/Parumala\/Default.htm (Accessed on October 2007)<\/h2>\">
Fig. 18<\/a><\/span> Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.19: Samadhi of Parumala Thirumeni, painting. Reproduced from www.icbs.com\/prayer\/Parumala\/Default.htm (Accessed on October 2007).<\/h2>\">
Fig. 19<\/a><\/span> Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.20: Parumala Thirumeni in another samadhi painting. Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 20<\/a><\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.17: Reproduction of the original samadhi photograph of Parumala Thirumeni, from Catholicatinte Nidhi (Biography and Study of H.H Baselius Gheevargheese), Baselius Research Centre, Vakathanam, 2005.<\/h2>\">Fig. 17<\/a> - Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.20: Parumala Thirumeni in another samadhi painting. Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">Fig. 20<\/a>] show samadhi<\/em> posture images of Thirumeni (1902) and its extractions and transitions, or the pictorial process of icon making.[Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.17: Reproduction of the original samadhi photograph of Parumala Thirumeni, from Catholicatinte Nidhi (Biography and Study of H.H Baselius Gheevargheese), Baselius Research Centre, Vakathanam, 2005.<\/h2>\">Fig. 17<\/a>]displayed here is the reproduction of an original photograph. Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.18: Samadhi of Parumala Thirumeni. Photograph in colour tone. Reproduced from www.icbs.com\/prayer\/Parumala\/Default.htm (Accessed on October 2007)<\/h2>\">Fig. 18<\/a> is the cropped and coloured image of the same photo\/event. While looking at the other two images [Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.19: Samadhi of Parumala Thirumeni, painting. Reproduced from www.icbs.com\/prayer\/Parumala\/Default.htm (Accessed on October 2007).<\/h2>\">Fig. 19<\/a> - Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.20: Parumala Thirumeni in another samadhi painting. Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">Fig. 20<\/a>], we can get a clear idea about what is visually excluded as well as newly incorporated into the picture. All other characters and background figures are eliminated from the last two images, and new signs such as the shadow of a church with a cross as well as an aura are affixed. These acts of exclusion and inclusion on the surface of the picture are actually deviating the image from its original moment. At the same time, the newly constructed image and interconnected signs are able to trigger multiple conscious and unconscious meanings for the viewer. This conscious or unconscious inducement might emerge either from cultural habit, the momentum of visual experience, or from a subjective religious and spiritual mentality. Again, the viewer’s mental landscape is a crucial element in constructing the iconic value of any image. <\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.20: Parumala Thirumeni in another samadhi painting. Reproduced from Fr. Jacob Kurian (ed.) Parumala Smruthi (Parumala Memory), Malankara Saba Magazine, Kottayam, 2002.<\/h2>\">Fig. 20<\/a>]:<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.21: Ayyankali’s portrait. Printed photograph. Publication details are not available.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 21<\/a><\/span> Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.22: Ayyankali in calendar art. Kottayam, 2007. Photograph by author<\/h2>\">
Fig. 22<\/a><\/span> <\/span>Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.23: A painted image of Ayyankali in billboard of Akhila Kerala Cheramar Hindu Mahasabha, Kottayam, 2007. Photograph by author.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 23<\/a><\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n
Fig.24: Poster image of Ayyankali (A3 size), Kannur, 2007.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 24<\/a><\/span> <\/span>Icons of the Reformist Period and ‘Re-formed’ Icons of the Present<\/h4>Sujithkumar Parayil<\/span>
Fig.25: Ayyankali’s picture displayed in poster of Akhila Kerala Cheramar Hindu Mahasabha.Kottayam, 2007. Photograph by author.<\/h2>\">
Fig. 25<\/a><\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n