You should probably focus on the “hyper masculine” Problem of rape in India specifically and only amoung the highly insecure moves which Romed Delhi in 1984 and hold up India’s rape stats today(were not sikhs and still aren’t sikhs) and less on the false perception of “Khalsa Sikhs hyper masculine features as a negation of the feminine” it’s funny your quote that from “simeran gell” And jps uberoi makes no sense as only the the kesh and kanga would be seen as “feminine”, even then only kesh on the head and a kanga has always widely been used for beards LOL. A kashera (shorts or boxers under pants) is in no way feminine and a Kara(iron bracelets) is rooted in military use on arms(wrist) as protection and weapons likewise as noted in sikh scripture and history alike. There no feminine associations aside from one part of the kesh, you should all keep your distribution femcel throughts to yourselves as no one in the Sikh community or outside has any interest in these weird justifications you give yourselves. Clearly there is no depiction of “hyper masculinity” amount the one painting of ONE guru that you could find and link to these weird feminine by deranged feminist theories and also probably that fact that you’ve been called a Sikh your whole life of something you cape singh kamkika LOOL cope but stop trying to attack us behind your meaningless phds weirdo